|Author:||Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, Edwin E. Aldrin|
|Title:||First On The Moon|
|Length:||a few weeks|
Gemstones in the dust
The story: this book chronicles the NASA project that put three men on the moon on July 20th, 1969. It is made up of interviews, background information, historical texts, citations, and photos. And maybe this is why, right when you pick it up, the question of its authorship arises. Sure, the book itself might list Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Buzz Aldrin as its “authors”, but in reality it was written by someone else entirely. The texts were gathered and compiled by two LIFE journalists: Gene Farmer and Dora Jane Hamblin. I chose to go with NA as the author anyway.
hundreds of dusty pages
There’s no way to sugarcoat this: this book is tough to read. Not only because it’s big and fat and heavy (around 500 pages), but because the writers tend to lose themselves in details. They talk about all kinds of technical things that have to do with the Saturn V rocket and with spaceflight in general. They give complete accounts of the communications between the astronauts and their command center, and they don’t even omit the parts where the transmission was unclear. They dig out stories about the astronauts’ wives and the pets that their kids play with. And they don’t shy away of adopting technical vocabulary and abbreviations directly from NASA.
It’s all pretty confusing sometimes.
And since I don’t care about the engineerings of space flight, it’s also pretty boring sometimes. Or rather: insanely boring. As I slowly, ever so slowly, made my way through its pages, I repeatedly found myself wondering whether I should just put the book away and read something else entirely. It was as dry as dust.
But not all of it.
finding the gems
The reason why I am giving this book a 6/10 rating is that there are some precious gems hidden within all that dust. As you’re reading through page after page of boring details, you might suddenly stumble upon something that is just so extraordinary that it makes everything else seem worthwhile.
Like the part when NA wonders about the appropriate words to say in the moment when he’s supposed to set foot upon the moon. Or when the crew are wondering about the fact that the moon seems to “smell like wet ashes”. Or when they say that astronauts never say goodbye before they leave for a mission. I found many parts like these that were truly fascinating
But there are two more things.
the greatness of men
This book is a travelogue in its own right. It chronicles one of the longest and most dangerous journeys that any man has ever taken. But there is something even more astonishing than the feat itself: the excellence and the humility of the people that made it possible.
Imagine three of the most highly qualified men in the world preparing to go to the moon and carve their names into the history books. And yet there is an equally qualified backup crew waiting in stand-by, just in case anything should go wrong. And of the three men that eventually end up going to the moon, only two can land there, while the third one has to wait for them in the space ship above, knowing full well that he will never set foot upon the moon himself.
There are so many egos to feel hurt, yet they all seem to somehow work together. I found it astonishing to read.
are we still in the Space Age?
And then there is the historical perspective: the book has an afterword by sci-fi writer Arthur E. Clarke, and even though I usually don’t enjoy reading forewords or afterwords or thank you notes, I still recommend reading this particular one. For one thing, Clarke seems to be a much better writer than the authors who compiled the rest of the book. But what really makes it worthwhile is the enthusiasm with which Clarke paints our future in the Space Age. By the early 2000s, he says with a considerable amount of conviction, we will go to the moon regularly, as if it was no big deal.
I am writing this review in 2017, and I am wondering if we are still in the Age of Space or not.
Overall, this is a book that needs to be stripped of all its boring parts – maybe two thirds or even three quarters of its content. The rest is great, though. And if you like space, then you should read it anyway.
Overall, I’ll give this a 6/10.