Why is it often better for a writer to not put things into perspective?

Is this book any good for those who are not into hardcore punk?

Does this book only exist because the author is fabulously rich?

What's the difference between telling anecdotes and writing a book?

If this book isn't badly written, then why is it still bad?

How far can humor carry a boring (and narcissist) story?

Can we really read about warfare as if it was just an adventure?

Is this book just about a physical feat, or is there something more to it?

Aren't less words sometimes better, even if the words are beautiful?

Why do these travel stories from 19th century Germany remain so recommendable?

Why is it so much fun to read Medieval travel stories that are at least partly untrue?

Are we looking at a career-obsessed explorer or at a blueprint for Indiana Jones?

Is this a book that you can enjoy even if you're not interested in polar bears?

What makes this book such a pleasant read after more than two centuries?