Apsley Cherry-Garrard
Awesomeness 7

Why would anyone rank this at the top of a list of travel books?

ACG is a young explorer on Scott’s team who survives and writes this book a decade later. It is essentially about Scott’s mission, but also about how ACG and other members personally experienced it. So it doesn’t consist only of ACG’s writing, but also of..

Summary 7.0 peachy

Apsley Cherry-Garrard

Author: Apsley Cherry-Garrard
Title: The Worst Journey In The World
Time: 1910-1913
Destination: Antarctica
Length: three years
Type: scientific exploration
Rating: 7/10

a bloated poet and a good quote

The story: Remember how much I loved the books about the Race To The South Pole by Robert Falcon Scott and Roald Amundsen? Well, this one is about the same topic. ACG is a young explorer on Scott’s team who survives and writes this book a decade later. It is essentially about Scott’s mission, but also about how ACG and other members personally experienced it. So it doesn’t consist only of ACG’s writing, but also of interspersed diary sections from other team members.

what I didn’t like

First things first: I was disappointed by this book. Not because it was bad per se, but because I remember reading a list of the Best Travel Books Of All Time, and this one was all the way at the top. And since I like Scott and Amundsen so much, I figured this one must be a sort of Scamundsen of travel books, and it must rule. Well, it did rule, but only in parts.

This book has several serious flaws. First of all, it is way too detailed and ends up too long (600 pages). ACG gives us scientific details en masse, talks about measurements and experiments, and he provides us with lengthy descriptions of the geography. Okay, Scott’s account of the journey had a bit of a similar problem, but then we have to remember that we are reading Scott’s unedited diary. ACG does not have that excuse. So the book is too long.

Second problem: the interspersed voices by other tour members. I mean it’s nice to hear not only ACG’s perspective but also that of the others, but this bloats the book even more. And sometimes the information they provide is overlapping or simply not interesting. So I think the excerpts should have been more limited.

Third problem: the excuses. Scott and several others died, which was due to external circumstances (mainly the weather) as well as to mistakes made by Scott himself and by his team (and also by ACG personally, as it turns out). Yet sadly, ACG invests a lot of his time and effort into defending himself and the other members of his team. This might be interesting as a document of the psychological toll that an expedition like this can take on an individual, but it’s not particularly interesting to read as part of a travel book.

So all of the above was pretty bad. This begs the question: what’s good?

the good stuff

First of all, ACG can be quite poetic.

„And if the worst, or the best, happens, and Death comes for you in the snow, he comes disguised as Sleep, and you greet him rather as a welcome friend than as a gruesome foe.“ (p.192)

This reminded me of Jack London. Which, in this case, is a very good thing.

Secondly, there is an awesome story hidden in this book. It’s called The Worst Journey In The World for a reason. Now we might think that the title must be referring to Scott’s journey, which could be considered the absolute worst journey ever (leading to his and his friends‘ deaths). But this is not what ACG had in mind.

The real worst journey starts at about page 250. It’s about ACG and two others leaving camp in winter, clawing their way through total darkness, trying to retrieve penguin eggs, and almost perishing in the process. This is the „worst journey“ that ACG is talking about. And it is as horrible as it is well-written. It is truly awesome and makes this book worthwhile.

And finally, there is the part where ACG uses the personal diary of fellow tour member William Lashly. It starts at around page 397, and it is about Lashly’s team of three trying to get back to camp after accompanying Scott as far as they could. Now this Lashly is either a terrible wordsmith, or he just doesn’t care, meaning that his style is terrible. But for some reason, the story he lays down is more gripping than almost all of the rest of this book. I loved it.

how to read this

I don’t know why anyone would rank The Worst Journey In the World at the top of a list of travel books. But then I don’t understand why people seem to love Kerouac’s ramblings so much, either. But unlike Kerouac, this one has more than just the occasional spark of poetry (okay, Kerouac’s „At dusk I walked. I felt like a speck on the surface of the sad red earth.“ was a damn good line).

Here’s how to read this book for maximum enjoyment: read the beginning, then skip over most of the details and go to the actual worst journey. After this part just  keep reading, but whenever ACG (or the others) get lost in details skim over them. But make sure not to miss Lashly’s account!

Overall, I’ll give this a 7/10.

Leave a comment